Article

Detection vs. mitigation authority

At a glance

Detection and mitigation have different legal requirements. Qualifying SLTT agencies may have conditional mitigation pathways. Under 28 CFR 124.4, contractors cannot operate mitigation systems or execute mitigation actions for those agencies.

Why this matters

A buyer guide to why the legal line matters — and where contractors stop. Buyers comparing OEMs, integrators, and in-house builds need clear language before procurement documents harden the wrong assumptions.

A procurement decision, not a product label

Before purchasing, ask what the system actually does: senses emissions, captures communications, tracks an object, transmits, interferes, takes control, or physically affects an aircraft. A passive or active marketing label does not settle legality.

Allocate responsibilities in writing

Identify the operator’s authority, required approvals, response procedures, and contractor role. Qualifying SLTT agencies have specific requirements; contractors may support technology but cannot exercise their mitigation authority. Detection services that do not require the Act’s authority are addressed separately in 28 CFR 124.4.

Continue the review

The regulatory explainer summarizes the authority boundaries. The interagency advisory discusses functionality and use. Counsel review is pending.

Primary sources

Discuss your site ->

Discuss your requirements

Share a general business summary. Please leave out sensitive site details.